lol what? Before that would ever happen the USA Canada Israel and coalition would stop it. Again WW3 will not happen in our life time. Very few countries have the tech and the weaponry to sustain a long drawn out world invasion. And those who do have ties economically to the countries worth taking out in WW. Syria just does not have close to enough power allies and weapons to start one. In the scheme of things the best they are is mosquitos who would get crush by the bigger countries
i never said syria would start ww3. i said the conflict in syria will ignite ww3. don't forget that syria's biggest ally is russia. the syrian army does not get their weapons at their local walmart, after all.
I do have to agree here with Visionskate,the conflict in Syria is weak and will not begin anything,,Russia is not allies with Syria,Russia's only mid-eastern ally is Iran,however whether WW3 happens within our life time or not,The beginning of massive global conflict and cold wars will take place,Its bound to happen within the next hundred years of course.
But the far eastern powers are another matter,If they step into the middle east or if north korea invades south korea,that could mean the beginning of a global conflict,people in this age tend to think we are all one joyous global web and nothing can go wrong,thats false,the world is now more prone to warfare due to sensitive ties,here is an example:
If in the 1400's England decided to go to war with Germany,It would only be a war between England and Germany (and possibly a few allied Vassals).
However if that exact same conflict were to happen in the 21st century,almost every global power would step in,touching off conflict almost everywhere.
I sort of think that the leaders of the world, want this, or see this as the only way to reshape our world. The values and morals of today are so horribly skewed it's abysmal.
Also most of the systems in place that support our society, is faulty and obsolete. In other words, we as a society are evolving, but the systems we've crafted to hold our society together, aren't. It's getting so bad that things are actually becoming really messy, and thus requiring the easy solution of a good old fashioned reformat.
I also see the greed of the world leaders seeing it as an opportune moment to seize complete power over the people world wide. There's been a great deal of talk about a one world government and one world currency system. It is probably one of the biggest conspiracy theories in the world. Talked about by musicians mainstream or not for generations now.
I don't know if I fully believe this wholeheartedly, but it is definitely worth it to keep an open mind.
Revile, I totally agree with that third paragraph. Not just buffoons like Alex Jones but credible people like Jesse Ventura and William Cooper and even President Kennedy publicly touched on the subject. In order to seize total control over the entire globe with a wrongful one world totalitarian socialist government that no one can escape from or reform there has to be a "threat to all of humanity". That's where the campaign to sway public opinion to support outlawing gun ownership, private property ownership and religious practice comes in. It's all about reducing the population and having a set amount of workers to keep things running and keep the elite at elite status without sharing the wealth. Classism at it's finest.
M.C. Too Tall
Master of Sound Quality
If any of you live in America you already know that its happening here,Barack Obama seems to already be trying to suppress and suspend the constitutional amendments,hes only doing it stealthily unless americans begin an open rebellion.
As much mistrust as I have of world governments,I ment this forum as a scientific forum,not as a conspiracy fourm,so please do speak of your opinions on the possibility of a third world war instead of opinions on a world government.
"I don't think WW3 is right around the corner. Whilst humanity has repeated itself in petty squabbles and minor foreign intervention wars, i'm rather certain the world is in a much better shape than it has been in the past in terms of stability. We might have little to no faith in our politicians but can we soundly judge them? Having never been in such a position before?"
I must indeed say that this paragraph is 98% incorrect,first of all as I have said a few posts above " If in the 1400's England decided to go to war with Germany,It would only be a war between England and Germany (and possibly a few allied Vassals). However if that exact same conflict were to happen in the 21st century,almost every global power would step in,touching off conflict almost everywhere.
and second of all,I believe our political leaders around the world are not stable,decent politics,Barack Obama,the president of the United States is a very idiotic and indecent man,he is attempting to exhaust American resources on another unnecessary war in Syria.There are also many pseudo-socialist scum in the U.S,Mayor Bloomberg of new York city is a prime example of that.
"Yes government methods are archaic compared to how society is evovling. But romanticizing revolutions as so many western people do is pathetic. Just look at the history of rebellions. The bloodshed, the instability, the sheer chaos and above all - how many facists, extremists and dictators have seized power after such events".
That theory is very incorrect for some nations,while middle eastern rebellions may lead to that,an American,European,and far eastern Asian rebellion is needed.
the world's current superpowers are all controlled by these "dictators" so to speak,and they are imposing unfair laws among citizens,We cannot have one such as Barack Obama,Vladmir puttin,Kim jong un,or Xi Jinping leading the world into the future,unless a third world war may happen sooner.
Whats making me laugh is you,I was referring to the middle ages (if you even know what that is),you wasted valuable time writing that paragraph,you should put that time to good work by actually putting some study into history.
I suppose your just another one of those people who have been "brainwashed" by the American media,or you just have a simple lack of knowledge politically,I also suppose you think communism,facisim,and pseudo-socialism (if you know what those are) are decent government types.
You also most likely did not read this forum correctly,you merely skimmed over it,which is indeed pathetic,I am not trying to prove a political point in this fourm,I am only scientifically analyzing the possibility of WW3 while listening to other's opinions and challenging them.
You on the other hand has posted on this fourm assuming that you have sufficient historical/scientific knowledge to challenge global common-sense...dream on,you barely even knew when WW2 took place,you assumed it took place in the 1400's (how pathetic is that) WW2 took place in 1939-1945,I strongly recommend you take history classes.
atleast have a valid response beside "STFU, you fucking sick degenerate atheist!!! " that sounds so unintelligent, you could even be warned by the mods for outright cussing at a user in that manner, just trying to give you future advice.
A part I found to be pivotal: At 05:40 US General Wesley Clark explains (back in 2007) how the US military was asked to start preparing in the early '00s to "take out... Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran..."
It seems it is to enforce & protect the (currently precarious) US "petro-dollar" as the basis of international trade; a source of immense wealth and power for Western banks and corporations.
There are media reports about that Russia & China have warned of possible dire (including nuclear) consequences of the US invading Syria and/or Iran; whether it be from them or more likely the area imploding, having widespread economic effects world wide if energy supplies are majorly impacted.
Regards oil, it seems there is more oil in South Australia (recently discovered) than Saudi Arabia. I recall it will require fracking. Similarly, some think that the US will soon out produce Saudi Arabia in terms of barrels per day.
So the US might not be so interested in maintaining its position in the middle east. Saudi Arabia (and the entire Middle East) might soon be less relevant, be not as important or powerful, in 5-15 years. Though the Saudis & Qatar may still be at loggerheads with Russia about supplying energy to Europe; a large part of what the conflict in Syria seems to be about. If you read around it seems the Saudis (& Qatar) are behind a lot of the 'jihadist' terrorism like funding the 'rebels' (consisting of foreign mercenaries) in Syria at present. It seems the Saudis have been doing similarly in many wars over past 30+ years eg. in Afghanistan late 70s and early 80s.
...it will or may not come until the real dirty guts in men are found concerning red tape in the routs of the early birth of the human race and how it got organized right from the start in terms of languages and reason, writing, etc, - forbidden info, I think, is held today on earth, may get revealed someday - Good things from the start, not later after months or years, I think!
+++++ Mfusic has touched my heart too deep, is it a sin to ignore it? +++++
I believe we're just going to find some excuse or trump up charges to attack one another; and it will be a domino effect.
Russia and other countries will clearly team up; an attack upon one of its own nations (by its own nation) will be a good enough excuse to wage war---bluntly put, they're trying to find reasons as to possibly find War with America justifiable.
We're already losing power, and they can sense this. They'll attack. It'll be crazy, but I'm sure it'll happen.
^ lol. When has Russia ever joined into a War unless it was worth it and by worth it .And by worth it I mean expansion of new territory or supression of its minor states trying to leave. They will not get involved. China also will not. They will make money with or with out Syria.
Doomsday thinkers clearly do not understand the mechanics of military thinking. As stated before no country has the means to sustain WWIII. It would be drawn out and would cost too much. It doesn't make sense. And before the nuclear bomb theory happens. No that will not happen the states has the means to destroy them before impact and owns enough to destroy the world ten times over.
There will always be warmongering politicians in our world ,whether it be in any country.
I am not very sure on the nuclear warfare theory of WW3,when people think of WW3 they think solely of nuclear weapons,what they fail to understand is that WW3 could still be fought electronically, chemically or even aquatically.The effects of a failing power grid would be apocalyptic in our time and would therefore cause the collapse of modern society,just as a nuclear war would cause.
There was something to have been gained in occupation for the corporate bigs and the federal reserve who are the behind the scenes monarchs of the "free" world but the people have come to realize that the common folk do still have a voice and that it's not futile to speak against what they don't want the ones publicly representing their government doing.
I wouldn't be surprised if at some point it will be known and disclosed to humans that their heritage came from trash from every corner of the universe; And that at some point a new civilized way came along to start better things from, once again, authoritarians who set the human race after getting it remodeled from way, way back in time genetically through DNA, you might call this the Adam and eve start from what was there already but in language and skill.
*** What I am saying is that humans will become cold as a result of this disclosure and many will want an end, so such disrespect may very well lead to the new war that I think may have to do with who will disclose such info but from abroad earth. ***
I think that whoever set up the earth as it stands, did not, and may not want to intervene for the right reasons.
I insist that WW3 will have something to do with aliens from abroad earth, yet it may not get to the public openly.